Agents fitted to the standards, master specifications and approval paths your discipline groups already follow, connected to the platforms your offices run.
A firm designing the building systems of hospitals, laboratories, data centers and airport terminals does not lack tools. It has processes that differ by office or discipline group, standards that live in several places, and leaders who learn of a problem after a set has gone out. PRESWERX builds agents on Claude, among the models behind our work, to close those gaps for the mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural and fire protection groups alike.
Each build begins with what your firm has already refined: master specifications, typical details, calculation templates, QA/QC checklists, phase submission formats and the way principals approve a deliverable. Those sit in a Claude Project or a connected folder, so a draft arrives in your format and cites your references, and the same agent can serve any group that adopts it.
The agent drafts, checks, compares, assembles and flags. A named reviewer reads every output, and the engineer of record or discipline leader decides, signs and seals. Design, code interpretation and compliance opinions stay with the people licensed to carry them.
We talk with the principals, discipline leaders and QA/QC reviewers, read standards and closed-out project records, and choose the first process worth building.
The agent is connected once IT signs off and tested on deliverables your firm has already issued. Reviewers mark what it got wrong and each correction goes back into the instructions.
As drafts need only light edits, the agent takes on more processes, discipline groups and offices, at the pace your leadership sets.
A principal in charge opens a new mission-critical facility and wants criteria language that matches the firm's last two. The agent assembles a draft basis of design from those records and the owner's requirements, marking every open item. The electrical and mechanical discipline leaders settle each marked item before it goes to the owner.
A technical director finds that two offices cite different domestic water and sprinkler details on hospital work. The agent compares both sets against the firm's standard details and lists each difference. The plumbing and fire protection leaders decide which version the firm adopts.
A QA/QC director wants a review checklist for an airport terminal that reflects its smoke control, emergency power and framing systems. The agent proposes one from the master lists and the project scope. The director removes the lines that do not fit and the engineer of record approves the result.
A structural discipline leader wants one narrative layout for the towers and courthouses designed in several offices. The agent drafts each narrative from the project's criteria and the firm's template. The engineer of record reads each against the analysis before it is issued.
It starts with your firm's records rather than a tool. We ask for standards, past deliverables and checklists from one discipline group or office, plus conversations with the people who write and review them. From those we choose where the first agent starts, and extend to other groups afterward.
No. Claude reads long documents, drafts text and follows written instructions, and it can be wrong. Design, calculations and code interpretation stay with your engineers, and the engineer of record seals the work.
No. We are an independent company with no tie to Anthropic: not a reseller, not a representative, not an extension of its team. Claude is named on this site only to say what some of our agents run on, alongside other models.
Before anything connects, we review the data terms of your Claude plan with your IT and security leads and agree which systems the agent reads. We begin with sample documents, and client files are connected only when your reviewers decide.
Yes. Your leadership sequences the rollout: one discipline group or office first, with projects at any phase, then wider as drafts need lighter edits.
The templates, instructions and documentation written for your firm are yours to keep and adjust. Your digital practice or BIM leader receives a binder so routine changes do not depend on us.