Master specifications, code adoption and local amendments, reference standards and owner design standards, kept current across every office.
A firm that designs in several jurisdictions keeps master specifications, typical details and design standards that fall out of step: one office cites the previous code edition, another has not picked up a local amendment, and an owner's design standard changes without the project team seeing it.
This agent works with the text. It reads the code edition, the amendments the firm names and the owner's standards, compares them with the master specification sections and typical details, and shows each change as markup against the firm's own text. It covers mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural and fire protection references together. It never interprets a code or decides what applies.
We connect the agent to the master specifications, typical details and standards library your firm keeps, once your IT and security reviewers approve.
The agent compares the new text with your sections and shows each proposed change as markup, flagging every place it is unsure.
The technical director and discipline leaders accept or reject each change. Accepted edits become the firm's current master.
A technical director is told the adopted electrical code has changed. The agent lists each master specification section and typical detail that cites the old edition. The electrical discipline leader decides which edits the firm makes.
A fire protection leader finds a city has amended its sprinkler and standpipe requirements. The agent compares the amendment with the firm's details and shows each difference. The leader decides what the firm adopts.
A health system issues a revised domestic water and medical gas standard. The agent compares it with the project criteria on three hospital projects. The plumbing discipline leader decides how each project responds.
A structural group needs its general notes and specifications brought in step with a new edition. The agent produces markup against each section. The engineer of record decides what changes.
It reads the master specification library and standards your firm keeps, in tools such as SharePoint or your specification platform, as your IT and security reviewers approve.
No. It compares text and shows changes. A named engineer decides what a code edition or amendment requires of a project.
A technical reviewer your firm names, with the discipline leader accepting each change. Nothing replaces a master section until a person has accepted it.
The jurisdictions and amendments your firm works in are loaded as reference sets. One office goes first, and others follow as your leadership decides.
The reference set is replaced and the comparison is run again. Your reviewers check the markup before it is accepted.
The master text, templates and instructions are yours. Project data stays under the terms of the Claude plan your firm chooses, reviewed with your IT lead before connection.